I saw 'The Maze Runner' last year in the cinemas but didn't think to review it at the time. So last night I watched it again, just to see what I thought of it now. I really liked it at the time, but it's one of this movies where so much is happening that doesn't make sense, you have to watch it at least twice to really make your mind up about it.
It's another dystopian future themed movie based on a series of books. This is the first in the series, with the second movie due for release sometime this year. I actually quite enjoy this genre. I like delving into post-disaster worlds that people create because even the ones that appear similar on the surface usually turn out to be completely different (I'm saying this with everyone who called 'Divergent' a 'Hunger Games' rip off in mind, because I personally couldn't find a ton of similarities to those series).
'The Maze Runner' revolves around a young dude name Thomas, who wakes up in a metal box that is being elevated upwards. When he reaches the top he is found by a group of other young dudes. He can't remember anything but his name and has no idea where he is, just like the other guys. It turns out that every month for the past couple of years a new guy arrives memoryless in the box with supplies. They are in the middle of an enormous maze that is patrolled by 'grievers', which are basically massive ugly, spidery killing machines. Each day 'runners' go out into the maze to try and find a way out. Thomas becomes a runner (duh) and become determined to get himself and his new friends out. Not long after his arrival another box is delivered. This time the only thing in it is a girl with a note saying 'She's the last one ever'. It then becomes imperative that Thomas, the girl and the other guys find a way to beat the grievers and find a way out of the maze in order to survive.
THE GOOD:
The idea behind this story is a great one. I've read a lot of books and watched a lot of movies in this genre and I haven't really seen one like this. I like that the author of the books was clearly unafraid of coming across as sexist. Don't get me wrong, as a woman I love a good story with a kick arse heroine, but I think sometimes authors and screenplay writers get a little too concerned with coming across sexist and end up missing the mark. I have no problem whatsoever with a story mostly comprised of male characters. What I look for in stories is a group of characters that are distinct and original.
The group of actors chosen for this movie works really well. They provide the right amount of suspense and drama without overacting. I haven't read the books, so I went into this (the first time) not having the foggiest idea what it was about. All I could figure was that there would be a big maze at some point. With that in mind, I love the storyline of the movie. It really keeps you guessing. Just when you think you kind of know what's happening it changes gear and throws you in another direction.
THE BAD:
The character Gally absolutely shit me to tears. I'm guessing he was supposed to, but for most of the movie I just wanted to slap him and tell him to stop being such a massive baby. Also, right at the end, after they've clearly left him behind in the 'Glade', which is the place they live in the middle of the maze, he shows up out of the blue and there's no explanation as to how that was even possible. I watch CinemaSins on YT all the time and all I could think was that they would totally sin the crap out of that.
Some of filming choices were a little disorienting at times. For example, in the scene when the grievers attack them in the Glade, it's so dark you can barely see it properly and they have a lot of running shots, which are really bumpy. I get where they were coming from by having those, but I think the technique might have been a little overused.
THE OVERALL:
I really enjoyed this movie. It was different from other in its genre, though my personal favourite is still Divergent. I think the casting was great and the story itself was nice and suspenseful. Apart from the possible overuse of a filming technique, nothing else felt over done in the movie (except for the screen time Gally had, but hey, I just didn't like the dude). I give kudos to the actor who played Gally, because it's very rare that I seriously hate a character. I think when you hate a character to an irrational degree you can thank the actor for doing his job so wonderfully. It's easy to like characters, but I think it must take so much extra effort to make a character really hate-able. The last character I hated to such a degree was the Governor on 'The Walking Dead'. Anyone who watches that show knows what I'm talking about. If you're in to all these dystopian-type movies (and books), I would definitely suggest giving this a go!
Drop Down Menu
Saturday, 7 February 2015
First Impressions: Eve Lom Radiance Perfected Tinited Moisturiser (Alabaster)
Okay, so this was supposed to go up yesterday but I was really lazy yesterday, like taking-a-nap-lazy so I pretty much did nothing. Anyway, the review I'm bringing you today was drafted yesterday, so it's still a 'First Impressions', you guys are just getting it a day late.
Like the Ellis Faas foundation, this is a super expensive product ($96) and I was comparing it to one of my HG foundations, NARS Sheer Glow (in Siberia).
11:00 AM:
Unlike the Ellis Faas stuff, I decided to leave the sponge for the day (mostly because walking all the way into the bathroom to wash it. Gross, I know) and use my Models Prefer flat top buffing brush. Mistake. It did not apply nicely with the buffing brush at all. In all the time I've had that brush I've never had a foundation not apply nicely with it. I know the NARS one does. I ended up trudging into the bathroom to wash my RT sponge so I could try to blend out the mess I created.
I'm not a fan of foundations that aren't versatile enough to be applied by different methods. Sometimes my sponge is dirty and I don't want to walk the 12 feet to my bathroom an wash it. Sometimes I just want to use a brush. Sometimes that brush is really dense, sometimes it's my soft and fluffy.
So basically it took me twice as long to apply it as it should have because it really didn't like my brush. Not happy so far.
The finish once it was blended out was okay. I liked it a little better than the Ellis Faas, but it still wasn't great. I will say that the coverage is great considering it's a tinted moisturiser.
4:00 PM:
Most of it had completely faded off by about an hour ago and now it's really patchy. Honestly there's really not a lot else to say about it. By this time laziness had well and truly set in, so unfortunately I forgot about taking a 'update' photo. Sorry!
OVERALL:
Another miss for me. Something else I noticed about this stuff is the smell. It's not awful, but I didn't enjoy it and I could still smell it, even when most of it had worn off. I know it's a tinted moisturiser, so I have no problem with the fact that it was mostly gone by 4:00, but I do wonder how they can justify $96 for this stuff. Yes, it had good coverage, but so does Sheer Glow. Also I get a better finish when I mix Sheer Glow with my Aveeno moisturiser than this stuff gave me. I was not at all impressed at the fact that it took a wet sponge to blend it out after applying it with a brush. I'm definitely grateful to the girl in Mecca who helped me out and gave me both samples to try, but I think I'm definitely going to just pick up another bottle of the Sheer Glow. It's cheaper, more versatile and most importantly, it's better.
Thursday, 5 February 2015
First Impressions: Ellis Faas Skin Veil Foundation (Shade s101)
I went into Mecca Cosmetica yesterday thinking I was going
in to repurchase a bottle of my beloved NARS Sheer Glow. Turns out I was
actually going in to suss out what other foundations I could try. I couldn’t
help myself. Once I was in the presence of all that makeup my mind went into
overdrive trying to figure out which section to check out first. Sheer Glow
kind of became an afterthought, after all I’ve already tried it! After my
little shopping trip (in which I purchased no foundation but instead opted for
the Too Faced Milk Chocolate Soleil) I came home with three different
foundation samples. I got the Eve Lom Tinted Moisturiser, Guerlain Parure de
Lumiere and the subject of today’s review, Ellis Faas Skin Veil Foundation.
This was supposed to be a trilogy, with a ‘First Impressions’
each day for three days, but it’s only to be two now because when I swatched
the Guerlain on my arm this morning, not only was it a bit too dark, but it
also started stinging and itching. Suffice to say I won’t be applying it to my
face.
Without any further ado let’s get stuck into the review. I’m
going to break it up into three sections to coincide with how often I checked
up on the wear of it.
12:00 PM:
I applied the foundation with my Real Techniques Miracle
Complexion Sponge, just like I do with most of my liquid foundations. Right off
the bat I wasn’t impressed with the application. Don’t get me wrong, it wasn’t
awful, but for $110 a bottle I expected a hell of a lot better. Just so you
know, I’m comparing both of the foundations to the Sheer Glow because it’s the
benchmark they have to live up to in order for me to even consider purchasing
them. With that in mind, as soon as I apply the Sheer Glow it looks amazing,
especially when using the sponge. Actually this is the first high end
foundation I’ve ever tried that hasn’t made me look instantly airbrushed by
using the sponge. In the photos below I have myself after moisturising and
primer but before foundation and then after the foundation was applied, and
finally after I applied the rest of my makeup.
Like I said, it’s okay, but not great. So far I’m nowhere
near as impressed as I was told I would be. I’ve barely heard a bad word
uttered about this stuff, and I just don’t get it. Not at the ridiculous price
point it’s at anyway. Oh, and just so you know, I know how crap the photos are in this post, but I think it's also because I wasn't enjoying the foundation and felt a little self-conscious about it. Basically I just wanted to take the photos quickly haha!
4:00 PM:
So the foundation’s been on for about four hours now and it
hasn’t really changed in appearance at all, except for one section. Around my
mouth and on my chin it’s gone really cakey. I don’t think you can see it in
the photo below (in which I'll ask you excuse my squinty eyes, it was really
sunny when i took it), but trust me, it was. When I first applied the
foundation I had trouble blending it into that section, and I’m pretty
disappointed to see it’s gotten worse. As for the rest of my face it’s okay,
but I’m still not happy with it.
10:00 PM:
Hour 10 and the foundation is definitely looking worse for
wear. I never really expect a foundation to last this long anyway, but when
comparing it to my Sheer Glow, it’s looking much worse than the Sheer Glow does
as this point. By the 10 hour mark with the Sheer Glow the foundation is starting
to go a little bit patchy, but it’s still mostly there and if I were to simply
touch up with a bit of powder I think it would be right for another few hours. With
the Ellis Faas I feel like to get a half decent finish again I would pretty
much have to wash it off and start again. Now, this isn’t a huge problem. I rarely
wear makeup for too much longer than 10 hours anyway, but at $110 you kind of
want a freaking miracle from the foundation. The photo below shows the state of
the foundation at hour 10.
OVERALL:
To this foundation I just say no. It doesn’t apply anywhere
near as easily and nicely as the Sheer Glow and it’s nearly double the price. Personally
even if I loved this foundation I would have a very, very hard time trying
justify the purchase to myself. In a way I’m almost glad it disappointed me. It
takes away the angst I would feel if I loved it but couldn’t afford it. I’m
sure that the people who rave about this aren’t completely out of their minds. The
whole reason I’ve been wanting to try this for ages is because Wayne Goss loves
it and gave it such a great review, and since he’s so awesome, I tend to
believe him. After all, he turned out to be right about the Bobbi Brown Skin
Foundation Stick (once I found the right moisturiser)! Unfortunately I can’t
jump on his bandwagon with this one. There are so many other foundations out
there that are absolutely beautiful which will not require a mortgage, your
soul and your first born to be able to afford.
Tuesday, 3 February 2015
Review: NYX Love in Paris Palette (Madeleines and Macaroons)
Today’s review is of a little NYX palette I bought just
before Christmas. I got this because I wanted something compact to take on my
holiday so I only needed it and my UD Naked Basics palette.
THE GOOD:
The colours in this a really pretty and there’s a good
selection, despite it only being a little ‘neutral’ type palette. I like that
the packaging is sleek and compact. It makes it so easy for travel. It was also
really inexpensive, just like pretty much all of NYX’s products.
THE BAD:
Yep, that was it for the good stuff. I cannot tell you how
disappointed I was with this palette. Apart from maybe one or two shades, there
is absolutely no decent colour payoff to the shades. It’s pathetic really. You
can tell from the swatch photo below that the colours are weak. The worst part
is that these swatches were done after I practically created a dent trying to
get some sort of colour payoff for the photo. I’m just at a loss for words to
describe how much I dislike this palette. I’m so glad it was only about $15
because I would have been really mad if I’d paid a lot for crap quality like
this.
THE OVERALL:
This palette sucks. It just sucks so bad. I don’t know if I
got a dud or if they’re all like this, and I have no intention of finding out.
I don’t think I will ever buy NYX eyeshadow again. Just a big ol’
disappointment for me this time.
Monday, 2 February 2015
Review: The Water Diviner by Andrew Anastasios & Meaghan Wilson-Anastasios
Last week I finished reading ‘The Water Diviner’. It was
written by Andrew Anastasios and Meaghan Wilson-Anastasios. Andrew was a
co-writer on the script for the film starring Russell Crowe, which I unfortunately
missed at the cinema and will now have to wait until its DVD release before I can
watch and review it.
The book follows the story of Joshua Conner, an Australian
man whose sons went missing after the landing at Gallipoli in World War I.
After the death of his wife, Conner ventures over to Turkey in search of his
sons so they might be buried next to their mother. Along the way he discovers
that his eldest son may have survived and the recovery mission becomes a rescue
mission. He befriends a young Turkish boy, who he feels a kinship with. He also
forms a bond with a Turkish soldier who fought at Gallipoli against his sons
and the other Australians.
THE GOOD:
This is a very compelling story. While I was reading the
book, I was constantly intrigued. I wanted to delve deeper and deeper with
Conner as he travelled through his story. The story is very well researched. The
attention to detail in the flashbacks of the battle scenes is amazing. They didn’t
shy away from the gory and terrifying parts of the war. From what I understand,
the authors took inspiration from actual accounts from the war.
Another part of the story I
loved is the fact that there were no ‘bad guys’ or ‘good guys’ in the story. It
would have been very easy for the authors to paint the Turkish soldiers in a
bad light, but that didn’t happen at all. In fact, the Turkish characters are
the heart of the story. Without them Conner’s story would have been very
different and possibly terrible to read. It displays excellently how war is not
about ‘good guys’ versus ‘bad guys’. War is terrible on all sides and each side
is fighting for something they are will to kill and die for. This book
understands and shows that.
THE BAD:
I’m going to be real. It’s
not that well-written. Now, it’s no Fifty Shades of Grey. That is the worst written
book I have ever read (I mean, didn’t she have a thesaurus? Why was the chick ‘flushed’
all the time?). The thing with this book is that I was very aware that these
people seemed very inexperienced in novel writing. If the story was so
compelling I probably wouldn’t have made it past the first few chapters. The chapters
before he gets to Turkey were so hard to get through. They seemed all over the
place and like the authors were trying to cram way too much information into
them.
The only other problem I had
was that on top of not being well written, it wasn’t edited all that well
either. I found multiple mistakes, including spelling mistakes. At one point I found
the word ‘they’ where the word ‘the’ should have been. To be honest, I was a
bit embarrassed for them. I would feel bad if I had worked so hard on a book
only to have it published with such silly little mistakes that shouldn’t have
been missed.
THE OVERALL:
I really liked this book. Once
I got past the first chapters I was engrossed in the story. I would definitely
recommend this to anyone who is interested in war history and wants a realistic
fictional story. I will issue this warning though: the scenes in which battle
conditions are talked about are fairly graphic. The authors obviously wanted to
be as realistic as fiction would allow them, and some of the scenes can be
confronting. If this isn’t the kind of thing you would be okay reading, I would
stay away. It’s a shame it wasn’t better written and edited. It could have been
a truly spectacular read if it was.
share: facebook | twitter | pinterest
Labels:
Books,
Entertainment
Review: Wild
So yesterday my beautiful bestie and I decided we were going
to do something different and go for walks around some national parks and
animal sanctuaries. I had even planned on doing a blog on our little adventure,
complete with tons of pictures and funny anecdotes. But alas, the temperature
was a son of a bitch. I think it was about 35 degrees (and the ‘Real Feel’ on
my phone said 44). It was so hot!! So, we decided to go shopping and then to a
movie. On the upside, I got a post out of the day anyway.
We decided to see ‘Wild’, since Kate really wanted to see
it. Honestly, I wasn’t too concerned with it at all. It wasn’t on my list to
see, but I’m willing to watch anything I can get a review out of.
Here’s what the movie is about:
Cheryl Strayed, played by Reese Witherspoon decides to walk
1,100 miles (around 1,800km). The movie is told in flashbacks of her memories
while she journeys along the Pacific Crest Trail (PCT). At age 22 her mother,
played by Laura Dern passed away suddenly. This sent Cheryl spiralling for the
next few years, while she tried to quell her all-consuming grief, until it
culminated in her decision to walk the PCT.
THE GOOD:
I went into this thinking it would bore me a bit, and be
kind of mushy. Don’t get me wrong, I’m all for inspirational movies, but I prefer
the ones that are more real and raw in their emotions. I don’t really go in for
the ‘feel-good’ inspirational stuff (unless it’s ‘The Blind Side’, that’s
awesome). With that in mind, it was with trepidation that I entered that cinema
and sat down. I was wrong.
This movie is most certainly inspirational, but there is
nothing ‘feel good’ about her journey. She battled death, divorce, drugs and
drowning in her own grief and self-loathing. It didn’t shy away from real parts
of life, which let’s face it, can be utterly disgusting sometimes. For example,
she can’t figure out her gas burner and has to eat ‘cold mush’ for days,
resulting in a shot of her ‘cold mush poo’. Yep, poo. She covered it with
rocks, but still. Also, the movie opens with her removing her boot to find one
of her big toe nails hanging mostly off. Yuck! Even more disgusting is her
pulling it off completely. Double yuck! Despite being grossed out, I was also
highly impressed by the movies decision not to shy away from that kind of
stuff. It’s real and the movie would have been less without it.
The chemistry between Witherspoon and Dern is great. Even when
they’re at odds it works. The same goes for Witherspoon’s chemistry with her
other co-stars. The best performance from her, however, comes in the scenes
where she’s alone on the trail. She goes through a barrage of emotions; happy,
angry, frustrated, frightened, starving, disgusted (mostly with her own
personal hygiene). Witherspoon helps you get lost with her and helps you feel
what Cheryl is feeling.
THE BAD:
I can’t fault this movie too much, but it isn’t flawless. One
thing I found a little hard to swallow was Witherspoon as a junior in college. It
wasn’t necessarily her age, although I think a 38 year old playing an 18 year
old is a bit of a stretch. I think she looked too experienced. Although her
scenes with Dern were fantastic, I still couldn’t help but think ‘gee, they can’t
have that much of an age gap in real life’ (I was right by the way, they’re
only about 10 years apart).
The only other bigger issue I found with the movie is that
you don’t really know that it’s about to end until she’s speaking the final
lines, of which the last word is ‘Wild’, which I found a little cliché. I don’t
necessarily think it ended badly, but it kind of just ended. She does mention
the life she will go one to have, but for me, it didn’t feel like it was time
to roll credits.
THE OVERALL:
I really enjoyed this movie. I don’t think it’ll come close
to being the best movie I see this year (that spot’s being reserved for
Jurassic World), but it was definitely poignant and beautiful without being
mushy and self-important. I’m not going to lie, I kind of wanted to go hiking
when I left the cinemas, but then I remembered I’m lazy and not really in need
of self-discovery, so I just went home instead. It also made me want to go
straight out and buy the book, which I will do very soon, and review as well. I
think this is a great movie. It’s not hard to watch and I definitely left
feeling empowered and inspired by her story. I think the casting of Witherspoon
as Cheryl was spot on and I would definitely watch this movie again.
share: facebook | twitter | pinterest
Labels:
Entertainment,
Movies & TV
January 2015 Favourites
Today I am bringing you my favourite things from January. I’ve
decided that this year I’ll have a healthy mix of beauty and random stuff in my
monthly favourites since I really want to branch out and cover more stuff on
here.
Without any further ado or babble let’s jump in!
MODELS PREFER TAPERED FACE BRUSH:
I bought this a couple of months ago (I think) and it’s
really only this month that it’s been getting a real work out. I’ve used it for
both blush and setting my foundation. I’ve more recently been using it for
setting foundation and I love it. I love that it’s not so huge that powder gets
everywhere, but it still covers a good amount of you face in one hit. It distributes
my Hourglass Ambient Light Powder beautifully. It’s so soft and glides over the
face so lightly that it doesn’t disturb any of the makeup it’s going over.
#GIRLBOSS BY SOPHIA AMORUSO:
I know I have a review of this, so I won’t go into too much
detail, but I wanted to mention this because I haven’t stopped thinking about
it since I started and finished reading it. She gave such good advice and
shared some really important lessons throughout the book. It’s so well-written
and so easy to read. I highly recommend it!
M.A.C. OMEGA EYESHADOW:
I love this eyeshadow!! It’s the perfect cool brown crease
shade. I wear it all the time. I’ll either wear it just in the crease, with a
light shade over the lid or I’ll just slap this baby all of the lid. The other
day I wore it over the top of my Bad to the Bronze Colour Tattoo from
Maybelline and it looked beautiful. Another way I have been wearing this is as
a contour. I find it hard to find a contour that I like, and this guy has been
working a treat. It’s great because I can be really light-handed with it and it
makes my contour look really natural. It makes me want to bother with
contouring, which is very rare.
M.A.C. CREAMSHEEN IN PEACH BLOSSOM:
This is the lipstick I mentioned in my Christmas Haul. I got
this when I used my M.A.C. gift card. I’ve worn this so much this month. I don’t
honestly wear a lot of lipstick. I usually stick to lip balms and tints. This has
changed how I feel about lipsticks completely. It’s so creamy and lovely on the
lips. It builds nicely, but it can be sheer as well. It is the perfect peachy nude
for the colour of my lips and my skin tone. It looks like my lips but better!
M.A.C. BLUSH IN LOVECLOUD:
Last M.A.C. product I promise. This was the other product I got
with my gift card and I literally have not worn another blush since I bought
it. It is the perfect pink. Although it is a little on the cooler side, I find
it to be more neutral than anything. It’s really buildable and pigmented and
has the slightest sheen to it, which gives your cheeks the perfect healthy
glow. I just love this so much! It’s as good, if not better than my favourite
blush, which is the Estee Lauder Pure Colour Blush in Peach Passion.
BURT’S BEES ULTRA CONDITIONING BALM:
This is the best night time lip balm I have ever used. I get
really dry lips and I find that this keeps them nice and hydrated all through
the night. No other lip balm I have even used, not even my Benefit ones, do
that. I wouldn’t recommend this under lipstick, although I do if I don’t want a
tinted one, because it’s the only untinted one I have at the moment, but if you
have one that’s a little less moisturising I recommend that, because lipstick
and stuff can slip and slide over the top of this balm. It makes your lips look
nice and supple. I just love it so much!!!!
THE FLINTSTONES:
This is a really random one, but there is a reason to the
madness. I spent the better half of this month with a terrible ear infection. I
felt terrible and spent a lot of time lying in bed like a miserable bump. Usually
when I’m sick I opt for watching my ‘Star Wars’ collection (yes, even Episode
One), but I felt like watching ‘The Flintstones’ this time. So, I cracked out
my DVDs. I have seasons one to three, and I like that there’s about seven
episodes on each disc, so I didn’t have to get up to change them. I grew up
watching this show. My mum use to tape them in the morning for me when I was a
kid. She even sat there and took all the ads out, so the VHS was just straight cartoons,
no ads. I still love this show (and I’m not embarrassed!) and am glad I had the
DVDs on hand.
NOT THAT KIND OF GIRL BY LENA DUNHAM:
This isn’t a shocker. I’ve completely fallen in love with
Lena Dunham and this book really cemented that. I’m hooked on her now, and if
it weren’t for all the other books on my list to read, I’d read it again and
again!
BAREMINERALS FOUNDATION IN FAIR:
I rediscovered this stuff this month while I was sick. There
were times when I needed to venture outside and this is the foundation I would
slap on quickly. This shade is pretty much a perfect match for my skin tone,
and unlike every other mineral foundation/powder I’ve tried, I don’t have a
reaction to it. All the others make me red and itchy, but I don’t react at all
with it. I did ever so slightly with the matte formula, which I tried first,
but the original formula is totally fine. It looks beautiful on my skin, and
even in the crazy heat we’ve been having here, it stays nicely throughout the
day. I wore it for 12 hours yesterday and it only went patchy at about hour 10
or 11.
AUDREY HEPBURN T-SHIRT:
I got this from K-Mart for about $15 a few weeks ago and
have lived in it since. I got a bigger size so it was loose and I could laze
about in it. It’s so comfy and it has Audrey on it, need I say more. Audrey
Hepburn is my favourite actress of all time, and I admire her wholly. I didn’t
even think twice about this shirt. Usually I wouldn’t spend more than a couple
of bucks on a shirt I wasn’t going to wear anywhere but the house, but this is
different. It Audrey Hepburn!
share: facebook | twitter | pinterest
Labels:
Beauty,
Books,
Entertainment,
Favourites,
Movies & TV
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)